Finland vs Paraguay: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square

Finland
0.0499 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Paraguay
0.0509 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland rank
105th
Paraguay rank
103rd

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square over time

  • Finland
  • Paraguay
00.020.040.06196119922023

How they compare

Paraguay currently reports 0.0509 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0499 metric tons per square kilometre in Finland, a difference of 0.001 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Paraguay ahead.

Finland ranks 105th and Paraguay ranks 103rd of 215 countries.

Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland Paraguay Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0007 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0007 metric tons per square kilometre Finland
1970s 0.0066 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0066 metric tons per square kilometre Finland
1980s 0.0338 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0338 metric tons per square kilometre Finland
1990s 0.0567 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0004 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0564 metric tons per square kilometre Finland
2000s 0.0457 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0042 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0414 metric tons per square kilometre Finland
2010s 0.0448 metric tons per square kilometre 0.02 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0248 metric tons per square kilometre Finland
2020s 0.0501 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0431 metric tons per square kilometre 0.007 metric tons per square kilometre Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square, Finland or Paraguay?
Paraguay, at 0.0509 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0499 metric tons per square kilometre in Finland as of 2023.
What is the difference in seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square between Finland and Paraguay?
0.001 metric tons per square kilometre, with Paraguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Paraguay?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Finland and Paraguay rank globally for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square?
Finland ranks 105th and Paraguay ranks 103rd of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs Paraguay: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/finland/paraguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/finland/paraguay/">Finland vs Paraguay: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,245 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.