Finland vs Malawi: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square

Finland
0.0499 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi
0.0507 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland rank
105th
Malawi rank
104th

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square over time

  • Finland
  • Malawi
00.050.10.15196119922023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 0.0507 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0499 metric tons per square kilometre in Finland, a difference of 0.0008 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malawi ahead.

Finland ranks 105th and Malawi ranks 104th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 5 and Malawi in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland Malawi Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0007 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0007 metric tons per square kilometre Finland
1970s 0.0066 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0065 metric tons per square kilometre Finland
1980s 0.0338 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0016 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0322 metric tons per square kilometre Finland
1990s 0.0567 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0028 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0539 metric tons per square kilometre Finland
2000s 0.0457 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0109 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0348 metric tons per square kilometre Finland
2010s 0.0448 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0629 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0181 metric tons per square kilometre Malawi
2020s 0.0501 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0829 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0328 metric tons per square kilometre Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square, Finland or Malawi?
Malawi, at 0.0507 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0499 metric tons per square kilometre in Finland as of 2023.
What is the difference in seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square between Finland and Malawi?
0.0008 metric tons per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Malawi?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Finland and Malawi rank globally for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square?
Finland ranks 105th and Malawi ranks 104th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs Malawi: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/finland/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/finland/malawi/">Finland vs Malawi: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,245 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.