Estonia vs Zimbabwe: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square

Estonia
0.0215 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0185 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Estonia rank
131st
Zimbabwe rank
134th

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square over time

  • Estonia
  • Zimbabwe
00.020.040.06196119922023

How they compare

Estonia currently reports 0.0215 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0185 metric tons per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.003 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Estonia's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.

Estonia ranks 131st and Zimbabwe ranks 134th of 215 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Estonia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0081 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0007 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0074 metric tons per square kilometre Estonia
2000s 0.012 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0079 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0041 metric tons per square kilometre Estonia
2010s 0.0179 metric tons per square kilometre 0.046 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0281 metric tons per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 0.0214 metric tons per square kilometre 0.026 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0046 metric tons per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square, Estonia or Zimbabwe?
Estonia, at 0.0215 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0185 metric tons per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square between Estonia and Zimbabwe?
0.003 metric tons per square kilometre, with Estonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Zimbabwe?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Estonia and Zimbabwe rank globally for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square?
Estonia ranks 131st and Zimbabwe ranks 134th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Estonia vs Zimbabwe: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/estonia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/estonia/zimbabwe/">Estonia vs Zimbabwe: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,245 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.