Egypt vs Myanmar: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square

Egypt
1.6 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Myanmar
1.84 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Egypt rank
20th
Myanmar rank
18th

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square over time

  • Egypt
  • Myanmar
00.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Myanmar currently reports 1.84 metric tons per square kilometre against 1.6 metric tons per square kilometre in Egypt, a difference of 0.24 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.1 times Egypt's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Egypt ahead.

Egypt ranks 20th and Myanmar ranks 18th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 4 and Myanmar in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Myanmar Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0059 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0005 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0054 metric tons per square kilometre Egypt
1970s 0.0104 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0023 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0081 metric tons per square kilometre Egypt
1980s 0.0364 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0071 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0294 metric tons per square kilometre Egypt
1990s 0.0914 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0853 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0061 metric tons per square kilometre Egypt
2000s 0.5169 metric tons per square kilometre 0.64 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1231 metric tons per square kilometre Myanmar
2010s 1.24 metric tons per square kilometre 1.49 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2505 metric tons per square kilometre Myanmar
2020s 1.59 metric tons per square kilometre 1.8 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2184 metric tons per square kilometre Myanmar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square, Egypt or Myanmar?
Myanmar, at 1.84 metric tons per square kilometre against 1.6 metric tons per square kilometre in Egypt as of 2023.
What is the difference in seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square between Egypt and Myanmar?
0.24 metric tons per square kilometre, with Myanmar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Myanmar?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Egypt and Myanmar rank globally for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square?
Egypt ranks 20th and Myanmar ranks 18th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Myanmar: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/myanmar/">Egypt vs Myanmar: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,245 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.