Ecuador vs Norway: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square

Ecuador
4.98 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway
4.53 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
11th
Norway rank
12th

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square over time

  • Ecuador
  • Norway
012345196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 4.98 metric tons per square kilometre against 4.53 metric tons per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 0.45 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Norway's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Norway ahead.

Ecuador ranks 11th and Norway ranks 12th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Norway in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Norway Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.001 metric tons per square kilometre 0.001 metric tons per square kilometre Norway
1970s 0.0066 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0078 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0012 metric tons per square kilometre Norway
1980s 0.1469 metric tons per square kilometre 0.117 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0299 metric tons per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 0.4088 metric tons per square kilometre 0.7334 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3247 metric tons per square kilometre Norway
2000s 0.5123 metric tons per square kilometre 1.86 metric tons per square kilometre 1.35 metric tons per square kilometre Norway
2010s 1.71 metric tons per square kilometre 3.53 metric tons per square kilometre 1.82 metric tons per square kilometre Norway
2020s 4.07 metric tons per square kilometre 4.44 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3708 metric tons per square kilometre Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square, Ecuador or Norway?
Ecuador, at 4.98 metric tons per square kilometre against 4.53 metric tons per square kilometre in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square between Ecuador and Norway?
0.45 metric tons per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Norway?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Norway rank globally for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square?
Ecuador ranks 11th and Norway ranks 12th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Norway: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/norway/">Ecuador vs Norway: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,245 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.