Denmark vs Israel: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square

Denmark
0.8284 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Israel
0.6701 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Denmark rank
28th
Israel rank
31st

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square over time

  • Denmark
  • Israel
0.20.40.60.811.2196119922023

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 0.8284 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.6701 metric tons per square kilometre in Israel, a difference of 0.1583 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Denmark's figure about 1.2 times Israel's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Israel ahead.

Denmark ranks 28th and Israel ranks 31st of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 4 and Israel in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Israel Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2395 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4979 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2584 metric tons per square kilometre Israel
1970s 0.3415 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6041 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2626 metric tons per square kilometre Israel
1980s 0.6165 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5797 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0368 metric tons per square kilometre Denmark
1990s 1.05 metric tons per square kilometre 0.7388 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3146 metric tons per square kilometre Denmark
2000s 0.941 metric tons per square kilometre 0.9792 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0383 metric tons per square kilometre Israel
2010s 0.9218 metric tons per square kilometre 0.8964 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0254 metric tons per square kilometre Denmark
2020s 0.9506 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6758 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2748 metric tons per square kilometre Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square, Denmark or Israel?
Denmark, at 0.8284 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.6701 metric tons per square kilometre in Israel as of 2023.
What is the difference in seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square between Denmark and Israel?
0.1583 metric tons per square kilometre, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Israel?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Denmark and Israel rank globally for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square?
Denmark ranks 28th and Israel ranks 31st of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Israel: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/denmark/israel/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/denmark/israel/">Denmark vs Israel: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,245 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.