Curacao vs Eswatini: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square

Curacao
0.0023 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini
0.0015 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Curacao rank
174th
Eswatini rank
176th

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square over time

  • Curacao
  • Eswatini
00.0020.0040.006196819952023

How they compare

Curacao currently reports 0.0023 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0015 metric tons per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0008 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Curacao's figure about 1.5 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Eswatini ahead.

Curacao ranks 174th and Eswatini ranks 176th of 215 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Curacao averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Curacao Eswatini Difference Ahead
2010s 0.0006 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0019 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0012 metric tons per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 0.002 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0013 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0007 metric tons per square kilometre Curacao

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square, Curacao or Eswatini?
Curacao, at 0.0023 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0015 metric tons per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square between Curacao and Eswatini?
0.0008 metric tons per square kilometre, with Curacao ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Curacao and Eswatini?
13 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
How do Curacao and Eswatini rank globally for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square?
Curacao ranks 174th and Eswatini ranks 176th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Curacao vs Eswatini: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/curacao/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/curacao/eswatini/">Curacao vs Eswatini: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,245 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.