Cuba vs Palestine: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square

Cuba
0.1221 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Palestine
0.1047 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
72nd
Palestine rank
74th

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square over time

  • Cuba
  • Palestine
00.10.20.30.4196119922023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 0.1221 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.1047 metric tons per square kilometre in Palestine, a difference of 0.0174 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Cuba's figure about 1.2 times Palestine's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Palestine ahead.

Cuba ranks 72nd and Palestine ranks 74th of 215 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Palestine Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0003 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0003 metric tons per square kilometre Cuba
1970s 0.0095 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0095 metric tons per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 0.0412 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0412 metric tons per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 0.2153 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2153 metric tons per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 0.2813 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0041 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2773 metric tons per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 0.2779 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0601 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2177 metric tons per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 0.1846 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1141 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0705 metric tons per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square, Cuba or Palestine?
Cuba, at 0.1221 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.1047 metric tons per square kilometre in Palestine as of 2023.
What is the difference in seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square between Cuba and Palestine?
0.0174 metric tons per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Palestine?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Palestine rank globally for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square?
Cuba ranks 72nd and Palestine ranks 74th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Palestine: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/cuba/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/cuba/west-bank-and-gaza/">Cuba vs Palestine: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,245 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.