Cote d'Ivoire vs Sweden: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square

Cote d'Ivoire
0.0277 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
0.0281 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Cote d'Ivoire rank
120th
Sweden rank
119th

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square over time

  • Cote d'Ivoire
  • Sweden
00.010.020.030.04196119922023

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 0.0281 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0277 metric tons per square kilometre in Cote d'Ivoire, a difference of 0.0004 metric tons per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.

Cote d'Ivoire ranks 120th and Sweden ranks 119th of 215 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cote d'Ivoire Sweden Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0016 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0016 metric tons per square kilometre Sweden
1970s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0011 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0011 metric tons per square kilometre Sweden
1980s 0.0003 metric tons per square kilometre 0.011 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0107 metric tons per square kilometre Sweden
1990s 0.0016 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0176 metric tons per square kilometre 0.016 metric tons per square kilometre Sweden
2000s 0.0033 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0158 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0126 metric tons per square kilometre Sweden
2010s 0.012 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0322 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0202 metric tons per square kilometre Sweden
2020s 0.0233 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0309 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0077 metric tons per square kilometre Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square, Cote d'Ivoire or Sweden?
Sweden, at 0.0281 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0277 metric tons per square kilometre in Cote d'Ivoire as of 2023.
What is the difference in seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square between Cote d'Ivoire and Sweden?
0.0004 metric tons per square kilometre, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Sweden?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cote d'Ivoire and Sweden rank globally for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square?
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 120th and Sweden ranks 119th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cote d'Ivoire vs Sweden: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/cote-d-ivoire/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/cote-d-ivoire/sweden/">Cote d'Ivoire vs Sweden: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,245 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.