Cote d'Ivoire vs Fiji: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square

Cote d'Ivoire
0.0277 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Fiji
0.0297 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Cote d'Ivoire rank
120th
Fiji rank
117th

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square over time

  • Cote d'Ivoire
  • Fiji
00.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Fiji currently reports 0.0297 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0277 metric tons per square kilometre in Cote d'Ivoire, a difference of 0.002 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Fiji's figure about 1.1 times Cote d'Ivoire's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Fiji ahead.

Cote d'Ivoire ranks 120th and Fiji ranks 117th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cote d'Ivoire averaged higher in 1 and Fiji in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cote d'Ivoire Fiji Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre
1970s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre
1980s 0.0003 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1722 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1719 metric tons per square kilometre Fiji
1990s 0.0016 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1886 metric tons per square kilometre 0.187 metric tons per square kilometre Fiji
2000s 0.0033 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1021 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0988 metric tons per square kilometre Fiji
2010s 0.012 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0285 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0165 metric tons per square kilometre Fiji
2020s 0.0233 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0175 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0057 metric tons per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square, Cote d'Ivoire or Fiji?
Fiji, at 0.0297 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0277 metric tons per square kilometre in Cote d'Ivoire as of 2023.
What is the difference in seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square between Cote d'Ivoire and Fiji?
0.002 metric tons per square kilometre, with Fiji ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Fiji?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cote d'Ivoire and Fiji rank globally for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square?
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 120th and Fiji ranks 117th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cote d'Ivoire vs Fiji: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/cote-d-ivoire/fiji/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/cote-d-ivoire/fiji/">Cote d'Ivoire vs Fiji: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,245 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.