Costa Rica vs Nigeria: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square

Costa Rica
0.3225 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Nigeria
0.2842 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
52nd
Nigeria rank
55th

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Nigeria
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 0.3225 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.2842 metric tons per square kilometre in Nigeria, a difference of 0.0383 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Nigeria's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nigeria ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 52nd and Nigeria ranks 55th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 4 and Nigeria in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Nigeria Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0032 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0032 metric tons per square kilometre Nigeria
1970s 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0052 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0051 metric tons per square kilometre Nigeria
1980s 0.0033 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0097 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0064 metric tons per square kilometre Nigeria
1990s 0.098 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0192 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0788 metric tons per square kilometre Costa Rica
2000s 0.4014 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0744 metric tons per square kilometre 0.327 metric tons per square kilometre Costa Rica
2010s 0.4893 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3039 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1854 metric tons per square kilometre Costa Rica
2020s 0.3272 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2897 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0375 metric tons per square kilometre Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square, Costa Rica or Nigeria?
Costa Rica, at 0.3225 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.2842 metric tons per square kilometre in Nigeria as of 2023.
What is the difference in seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square between Costa Rica and Nigeria?
0.0383 metric tons per square kilometre, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Nigeria?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Nigeria rank globally for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square?
Costa Rica ranks 52nd and Nigeria ranks 55th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Nigeria: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/nigeria/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/nigeria/">Costa Rica vs Nigeria: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,245 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.