China vs Singapore: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square

China
8.34 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
5.86 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
6th
Singapore rank
9th

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square over time

  • China
  • Singapore
02.557.51012.5196119922023

How they compare

China currently reports 8.34 metric tons per square kilometre against 5.86 metric tons per square kilometre in Singapore, a difference of 2.48 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes China's figure about 1.4 times Singapore's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China ahead.

China ranks 6th and Singapore ranks 9th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 3 and Singapore in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Singapore Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1185 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1185 metric tons per square kilometre China
1970s 0.2343 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1121 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1222 metric tons per square kilometre China
1980s 0.53 metric tons per square kilometre 1.86 metric tons per square kilometre 1.33 metric tons per square kilometre Singapore
1990s 1.98 metric tons per square kilometre 4.47 metric tons per square kilometre 2.49 metric tons per square kilometre Singapore
2000s 4.03 metric tons per square kilometre 7.44 metric tons per square kilometre 3.41 metric tons per square kilometre Singapore
2010s 6.2 metric tons per square kilometre 7.51 metric tons per square kilometre 1.31 metric tons per square kilometre Singapore
2020s 7.91 metric tons per square kilometre 6.62 metric tons per square kilometre 1.28 metric tons per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square, China or Singapore?
China, at 8.34 metric tons per square kilometre against 5.86 metric tons per square kilometre in Singapore as of 2023.
What is the difference in seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square between China and Singapore?
2.48 metric tons per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Singapore?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and Singapore rank globally for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square?
China ranks 6th and Singapore ranks 9th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Singapore: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/china/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/china/singapore/">China vs Singapore: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,245 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.