Cape Verde vs Mozambique: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square

Cape Verde
0.0087 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Mozambique
0.0099 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Cape Verde rank
151st
Mozambique rank
148th

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Mozambique
00.0020.0040.0060.0080.01196119922023

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 0.0099 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0087 metric tons per square kilometre in Cape Verde, a difference of 0.0012 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.1 times Cape Verde's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mozambique ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 151st and Mozambique ranks 148th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 1 and Mozambique in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Mozambique Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre
1970s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre
1980s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre Mozambique
1990s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre Mozambique
2000s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.002 metric tons per square kilometre 0.002 metric tons per square kilometre Mozambique
2010s 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre 0.002 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0018 metric tons per square kilometre Mozambique
2020s 0.0074 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0067 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0007 metric tons per square kilometre Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square, Cape Verde or Mozambique?
Mozambique, at 0.0099 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0087 metric tons per square kilometre in Cape Verde as of 2023.
What is the difference in seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square between Cape Verde and Mozambique?
0.0012 metric tons per square kilometre, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Mozambique?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cape Verde and Mozambique rank globally for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square?
Cape Verde ranks 151st and Mozambique ranks 148th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Mozambique: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/mozambique/">Cape Verde vs Mozambique: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,245 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.