Brazil vs Bulgaria: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square

Brazil
0.0949 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Bulgaria
0.0915 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
79th
Bulgaria rank
80th

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square over time

  • Brazil
  • Bulgaria
00.050.10.15196119922023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 0.0949 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0915 metric tons per square kilometre in Bulgaria, a difference of 0.0034 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bulgaria ahead.

Brazil ranks 79th and Bulgaria ranks 80th of 215 countries.

Bulgaria has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Bulgaria Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.035 metric tons per square kilometre 0.035 metric tons per square kilometre Bulgaria
1970s 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0584 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0583 metric tons per square kilometre Bulgaria
1980s 0.0013 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1134 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1121 metric tons per square kilometre Bulgaria
1990s 0.0071 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0584 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0513 metric tons per square kilometre Bulgaria
2000s 0.0321 metric tons per square kilometre 0.035 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0029 metric tons per square kilometre Bulgaria
2010s 0.0627 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0998 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0371 metric tons per square kilometre Bulgaria
2020s 0.0842 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1035 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0194 metric tons per square kilometre Bulgaria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square, Brazil or Bulgaria?
Brazil, at 0.0949 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0915 metric tons per square kilometre in Bulgaria as of 2023.
What is the difference in seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square between Brazil and Bulgaria?
0.0034 metric tons per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Bulgaria?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Bulgaria rank globally for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square?
Brazil ranks 79th and Bulgaria ranks 80th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Bulgaria: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/brazil/bulgaria/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/brazil/bulgaria/">Brazil vs Bulgaria: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,245 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.