Barbados vs Latvia: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square

Barbados
0.0128 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia
0.0126 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
144th
Latvia rank
145th

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square over time

  • Barbados
  • Latvia
00.020.040.06196119922023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 0.0128 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0126 metric tons per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 0.0002 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.

Barbados ranks 144th and Latvia ranks 145th of 215 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0074 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0074 metric tons per square kilometre Latvia
2000s 0.0019 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0086 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0067 metric tons per square kilometre Latvia
2010s 0.042 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0111 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0309 metric tons per square kilometre Barbados
2020s 0.0273 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0131 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0142 metric tons per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square, Barbados or Latvia?
Barbados, at 0.0128 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0126 metric tons per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square between Barbados and Latvia?
0.0002 metric tons per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Latvia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Latvia rank globally for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square?
Barbados ranks 144th and Latvia ranks 145th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Latvia: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/barbados/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/barbados/latvia/">Barbados vs Latvia: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,245 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.