Barbados vs Belize: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square

Barbados
0.0128 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Belize
0.0118 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
144th
Belize rank
146th

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square over time

  • Barbados
  • Belize
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 0.0128 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0118 metric tons per square kilometre in Belize, a difference of 0.001 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.1 times Belize's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Belize ahead.

Barbados ranks 144th and Belize ranks 146th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 1 and Belize in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Belize Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre
1970s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre
1980s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0025 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0025 metric tons per square kilometre Belize
1990s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0437 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0437 metric tons per square kilometre Belize
2000s 0.0019 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2902 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2884 metric tons per square kilometre Belize
2010s 0.042 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1795 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1375 metric tons per square kilometre Belize
2020s 0.0273 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0119 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0155 metric tons per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square, Barbados or Belize?
Barbados, at 0.0128 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0118 metric tons per square kilometre in Belize as of 2023.
What is the difference in seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square between Barbados and Belize?
0.001 metric tons per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Belize?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Belize rank globally for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square?
Barbados ranks 144th and Belize ranks 146th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Belize: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/barbados/belize/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/barbados/belize/">Barbados vs Belize: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,245 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.