Bahamas vs Botswana: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square

Bahamas
0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana
0.0003 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Bahamas rank
194th
Botswana rank
191st

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square over time

  • Bahamas
  • Botswana
00.0020.0040.0060.008196119922023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 0.0003 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre in Bahamas, a difference of 0.0002 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Botswana's figure about 2.9 times Bahamas's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Botswana ahead.

Bahamas ranks 194th and Botswana ranks 191st of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 4 and Botswana in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Botswana Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre
1970s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre
1980s 0.0025 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0025 metric tons per square kilometre Bahamas
1990s 0.001 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.001 metric tons per square kilometre Bahamas
2000s 0.0033 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0033 metric tons per square kilometre Bahamas
2010s 0.0005 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0005 metric tons per square kilometre Bahamas
2020s 0.0002 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0003 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square, Bahamas or Botswana?
Botswana, at 0.0003 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre in Bahamas as of 2023.
What is the difference in seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square between Bahamas and Botswana?
0.0002 metric tons per square kilometre, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Botswana?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bahamas and Botswana rank globally for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square?
Bahamas ranks 194th and Botswana ranks 191st of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Botswana: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/botswana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/botswana/">Bahamas vs Botswana: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,245 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.