Australia vs Canada: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square

Australia
0.0166 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Canada
0.0166 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
139th
Canada rank
138th

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square over time

  • Australia
  • Canada
00.0050.010.0150.02196119922023

How they compare

Canada currently reports 0.0166 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0166 metric tons per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 0 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 139th and Canada ranks 138th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Canada in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Canada Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0009 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0004 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0005 metric tons per square kilometre Australia
1970s 0.0013 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0005 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0008 metric tons per square kilometre Australia
1980s 0.0013 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0013 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre Canada
1990s 0.0027 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0074 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0047 metric tons per square kilometre Canada
2000s 0.0062 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0174 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0111 metric tons per square kilometre Canada
2010s 0.011 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0199 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0089 metric tons per square kilometre Canada
2020s 0.0167 metric tons per square kilometre 0.019 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0023 metric tons per square kilometre Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square, Australia or Canada?
Canada, at 0.0166 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0166 metric tons per square kilometre in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square between Australia and Canada?
0 metric tons per square kilometre, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Canada?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Canada rank globally for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square?
Australia ranks 139th and Canada ranks 138th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Canada: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/australia/canada/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/australia/canada/">Australia vs Canada: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,245 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.