Aruba vs Cape Verde: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square

Aruba
0.0083 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Cape Verde
0.0087 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Aruba rank
152nd
Cape Verde rank
151st

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square over time

  • Aruba
  • Cape Verde
00.0030.0050.0070.01196119922023

How they compare

Cape Verde currently reports 0.0087 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0083 metric tons per square kilometre in Aruba, a difference of 0.0004 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cape Verde ahead.

Aruba ranks 152nd and Cape Verde ranks 151st of 215 countries.

Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Cape Verde Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre
1970s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre
1980s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre
1990s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre
2000s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre
2010s 0.0028 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0027 metric tons per square kilometre Aruba
2020s 0.0083 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0074 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0009 metric tons per square kilometre Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square, Aruba or Cape Verde?
Cape Verde, at 0.0087 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0083 metric tons per square kilometre in Aruba as of 2023.
What is the difference in seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square between Aruba and Cape Verde?
0.0004 metric tons per square kilometre, with Cape Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Cape Verde?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Aruba and Cape Verde rank globally for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square?
Aruba ranks 152nd and Cape Verde ranks 151st of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Cape Verde: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/aruba/cabo-verde/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/aruba/cabo-verde/">Aruba vs Cape Verde: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,245 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.