American Samoa vs Jamaica: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square

American Samoa
0.09 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica
0.0896 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
American Samoa rank
81st
Jamaica rank
82nd

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square over time

  • American Samoa
  • Jamaica
00.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

American Samoa currently reports 0.09 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0896 metric tons per square kilometre in Jamaica, a difference of 0.0004 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jamaica ahead.

American Samoa ranks 81st and Jamaica ranks 82nd of 215 countries.

Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade American Samoa Jamaica Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre
1970s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0006 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0006 metric tons per square kilometre Jamaica
1980s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1022 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1022 metric tons per square kilometre Jamaica
1990s 0.0225 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3197 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2972 metric tons per square kilometre Jamaica
2000s 0.0635 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4905 metric tons per square kilometre 0.427 metric tons per square kilometre Jamaica
2010s 0.099 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1202 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0212 metric tons per square kilometre Jamaica
2020s 0.0825 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0864 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0039 metric tons per square kilometre Jamaica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square, American Samoa or Jamaica?
American Samoa, at 0.09 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0896 metric tons per square kilometre in Jamaica as of 2023.
What is the difference in seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square between American Samoa and Jamaica?
0.0004 metric tons per square kilometre, with American Samoa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for American Samoa and Jamaica?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do American Samoa and Jamaica rank globally for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square?
American Samoa ranks 81st and Jamaica ranks 82nd of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

American Samoa vs Jamaica: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/american-samoa/jamaica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/american-samoa/jamaica/">American Samoa vs Jamaica: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,245 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.