Afghanistan vs Zimbabwe: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square

Afghanistan
0.0179 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0185 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Afghanistan rank
135th
Zimbabwe rank
134th

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Zimbabwe
00.020.040.06196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0185 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0179 metric tons per square kilometre in Afghanistan, a difference of 0.0006 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 135th and Zimbabwe ranks 134th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre Afghanistan
1970s 0.0002 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre Afghanistan
1980s 0.0003 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0003 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 0.0005 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0007 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0002 metric tons per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.001 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0079 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0069 metric tons per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0.0081 metric tons per square kilometre 0.046 metric tons per square kilometre 0.038 metric tons per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 0.0166 metric tons per square kilometre 0.026 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0094 metric tons per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square, Afghanistan or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.0185 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0179 metric tons per square kilometre in Afghanistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square between Afghanistan and Zimbabwe?
0.0006 metric tons per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Afghanistan and Zimbabwe rank globally for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square?
Afghanistan ranks 135th and Zimbabwe ranks 134th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Zimbabwe: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/afghanistan/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/afghanistan/zimbabwe/">Afghanistan vs Zimbabwe: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,245 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.