Rwanda vs Singapore: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita

Rwanda
0.0006 metric tons per person
in 2024
Singapore
0.0006 metric tons per person
in 2024
Rwanda rank
104th
Singapore rank
102nd

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita over time

  • Rwanda
  • Singapore
00.0010.0010.0020.002196019922024

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 0.0006 metric tons per person against 0.0006 metric tons per person in Rwanda, a difference of 0 metric tons per person.

That makes Singapore's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.

Rwanda ranks 104th and Singapore ranks 102nd of 215 countries.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Singapore Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons per person 0 metric tons per person 0 metric tons per person
1970s 0 metric tons per person 0 metric tons per person 0 metric tons per person Singapore
1980s 0 metric tons per person 0.0005 metric tons per person 0.0004 metric tons per person Singapore
1990s 0 metric tons per person 0.0008 metric tons per person 0.0008 metric tons per person Singapore
2000s 0 metric tons per person 0.0012 metric tons per person 0.0011 metric tons per person Singapore
2010s 0.0001 metric tons per person 0.001 metric tons per person 0.0008 metric tons per person Singapore
2020s 0.0005 metric tons per person 0.0008 metric tons per person 0.0003 metric tons per person Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita, Rwanda or Singapore?
Singapore, at 0.0006 metric tons per person against 0.0006 metric tons per person in Rwanda as of 2024.
What is the difference in seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita between Rwanda and Singapore?
0 metric tons per person, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Singapore?
65 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2024.
How do Rwanda and Singapore rank globally for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita?
Rwanda ranks 104th and Singapore ranks 102nd of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Singapore: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-capita/rwanda/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-capita/rwanda/singapore/">Rwanda vs Singapore: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita
Unit
metric tons per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,819 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.