Cuba vs United States of America: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita

Cuba
0.0012 metric tons per person
in 2024
United States of America
0.0014 metric tons per person
in 2024
Cuba rank
81st
United States of America rank
78th

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita over time

  • Cuba
  • United States of America
00.0010.0020.0030.004196019922024

How they compare

United States of America currently reports 0.0014 metric tons per person against 0.0012 metric tons per person in Cuba, a difference of 0.0002 metric tons per person.

That makes United States of America's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1960 it was United States of America ahead.

Cuba ranks 81st and United States of America ranks 78th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 4 and United States of America in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba United States of America Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons per person 0.0006 metric tons per person 0.0006 metric tons per person United States of America
1970s 0.0001 metric tons per person 0.0008 metric tons per person 0.0007 metric tons per person United States of America
1980s 0.0004 metric tons per person 0.0013 metric tons per person 0.0009 metric tons per person United States of America
1990s 0.0021 metric tons per person 0.0015 metric tons per person 0.0006 metric tons per person Cuba
2000s 0.0027 metric tons per person 0.0017 metric tons per person 0.0009 metric tons per person Cuba
2010s 0.0026 metric tons per person 0.0014 metric tons per person 0.0012 metric tons per person Cuba
2020s 0.0016 metric tons per person 0.0014 metric tons per person 0.0002 metric tons per person Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita, Cuba or United States of America?
United States of America, at 0.0014 metric tons per person against 0.0012 metric tons per person in Cuba as of 2024.
What is the difference in seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita between Cuba and United States of America?
0.0002 metric tons per person, with United States of America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and United States of America?
65 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2024.
How do Cuba and United States of America rank globally for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita?
Cuba ranks 81st and United States of America ranks 78th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs United States of America: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-capita/cuba/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-capita/cuba/united-states/">Cuba vs United States of America: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita
Unit
metric tons per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,819 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.