Rwanda vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, annual growth

Rwanda
11.86 % change on previous year
in 2024
Tanzania, United Republic of
13.52 % change on previous year
in 2024
Rwanda rank
35th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
32nd

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, annual growth over time

  • Rwanda
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
-1000100200300197920012024

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 13.52 % change on previous year against 11.86 % change on previous year in Rwanda, a difference of 1.66 % change on previous year.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1983 it was Rwanda ahead.

Rwanda ranks 35th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 32nd of 199 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 2 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1980s 8.17 % change on previous year 26.08 % change on previous year 17.91 % change on previous year Tanzania, United Republic of
1990s 43.18 % change on previous year 2.9 % change on previous year 40.28 % change on previous year Rwanda
2000s 9.4 % change on previous year 17.84 % change on previous year 8.44 % change on previous year Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 61.29 % change on previous year 13.78 % change on previous year 47.5 % change on previous year Rwanda
2020s 17.01 % change on previous year 67.97 % change on previous year 50.96 % change on previous year Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, annual growth, Rwanda or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 13.52 % change on previous year against 11.86 % change on previous year in Rwanda as of 2024.
What is the difference in seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, annual growth between Rwanda and Tanzania, United Republic of?
1.66 % change on previous year, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Tanzania, United Republic of?
41 years are reported by both, from 1983 to 2024.
How do Rwanda and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, annual growth?
Rwanda ranks 35th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 32nd of 199 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, annual growth. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-annual-growth-rate/rwanda/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-annual-growth-rate/rwanda/tanzania/">Rwanda vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, annual growth</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 8,220 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.