New Zealand vs Sweden: SDDS/e-GDDS subscription
SDDS/e-GDDS subscription over time
- New Zealand
- Sweden
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 1 against 1 in Sweden, a difference of 0.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 1st of 214 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sdds/e-gdds subscription, New Zealand or Sweden?
- New Zealand, at 1 against 1 in Sweden as of 2023.
- What is the difference in sdds/e-gdds subscription between New Zealand and Sweden?
- 0, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Sweden?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
- How do New Zealand and Sweden rank globally for sdds/e-gdds subscription?
- New Zealand ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 1st of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as SDDS/e-GDDS subscription. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Special Data Dissemination Standard (SDDS) and electronic General Data Dissemination Standard (e-GDDS) were established by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for member countries that have or that might seek access to international capital markets, to guide them in providing their economic and financial data to the public. Although subscription is voluntary, the subscribing member needs to be committed to observing the standard and provide information about its data and data dissemination practices (metadata). The metadata are posted on the IMF’s SDDS and e-GDDS websites.