Malaysia vs Singapore: SDDS/e-GDDS subscription
SDDS/e-GDDS subscription over time
- Malaysia
- Singapore
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 1 against 1 in Singapore, a difference of 0.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.
Malaysia ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 1st of 214 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sdds/e-gdds subscription, Malaysia or Singapore?
- Malaysia, at 1 against 1 in Singapore as of 2023.
- What is the difference in sdds/e-gdds subscription between Malaysia and Singapore?
- 0, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Singapore?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
- How do Malaysia and Singapore rank globally for sdds/e-gdds subscription?
- Malaysia ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 1st of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as SDDS/e-GDDS subscription. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Special Data Dissemination Standard (SDDS) and electronic General Data Dissemination Standard (e-GDDS) were established by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for member countries that have or that might seek access to international capital markets, to guide them in providing their economic and financial data to the public. Although subscription is voluntary, the subscribing member needs to be committed to observing the standard and provide information about its data and data dissemination practices (metadata). The metadata are posted on the IMF’s SDDS and e-GDDS websites.