Aruba vs Serbia: SDDS/e-GDDS subscription
SDDS/e-GDDS subscription over time
- Aruba
- Serbia
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0.5 against 0.5 in Serbia, a difference of 0.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 79th and Serbia ranks 79th of 214 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.25 | 0.375 | 0.125 | Serbia |
| 2020s | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sdds/e-gdds subscription, Aruba or Serbia?
- Aruba, at 0.5 against 0.5 in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in sdds/e-gdds subscription between Aruba and Serbia?
- 0, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Serbia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
- How do Aruba and Serbia rank globally for sdds/e-gdds subscription?
- Aruba ranks 79th and Serbia ranks 79th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as SDDS/e-GDDS subscription. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Special Data Dissemination Standard (SDDS) and electronic General Data Dissemination Standard (e-GDDS) were established by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for member countries that have or that might seek access to international capital markets, to guide them in providing their economic and financial data to the public. Although subscription is voluntary, the subscribing member needs to be committed to observing the standard and provide information about its data and data dissemination practices (metadata). The metadata are posted on the IMF’s SDDS and e-GDDS websites.