Hong Kong vs Least developed countries: School life expectancy, primary and lower secondary, female

Hong Kong
10 years
in 2019
Least developed countries
7.85 years
in 2019
Hong Kong rank
38th
Least developed countries rank
33rd

School life expectancy, primary and lower secondary, female over time

  • Hong Kong
  • Least developed countries
02.557.510199720082019

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 10 years against 7.85 years in Least developed countries, a difference of 2.15 years.

That makes Hong Kong's figure about 1.3 times Least developed countries's.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong ranks 38th and Least developed countries ranks 33rd of 188 countries.

Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong Least developed countries Difference Ahead
1990s 8.72 years 4.86 years 3.87 years Hong Kong
2010s 9.73 years 7.72 years 2.01 years Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher school life expectancy, primary and lower secondary, female, Hong Kong or Least developed countries?
Hong Kong, at 10 years against 7.85 years in Least developed countries as of 2019.
What is the difference in school life expectancy, primary and lower secondary, female between Hong Kong and Least developed countries?
2.15 years, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Least developed countries?
9 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2019.
How do Hong Kong and Least developed countries rank globally for school life expectancy, primary and lower secondary, female?
Hong Kong ranks 38th and Least developed countries ranks 33rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as School life expectancy, primary and lower secondary, female (years). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Least developed countries: School life expectancy, primary and lower secondary, female. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/school-life-expectancy-primary-and-lower-secondary-female-years/hong-kong-sar-china/least-developed-countries-un-classification/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/school-life-expectancy-primary-and-lower-secondary-female-years/hong-kong-sar-china/least-developed-countries-un-classification/">Hong Kong vs Least developed countries: School life expectancy, primary and lower secondary, female</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
School life expectancy, primary and lower secondary, female (years)
Unit
years
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
233 places, 4,492 data points, 1981–2020
Last refreshed

Number of years a person of school entrance age can expect to spend within the specified levels of education. For a child of a certain age a, the school life expectancy is calculated as the sum of the age specific enrolment rates for the levels of education specified. The part of the enrolment that is not distributed by age is divided by the school-age population for the level of education they are enrolled in, and multiplied by the duration of that level of education. The result is then added to the sum of the age-specific enrolment rates. A relatively high SLE indicates greater probability for children to spend more years in education and higher overall retention within the education system. It must be noted that the expected number of years does not necessarily coincide with the expected number of grades of education completed, because of repetition. Since school life expectancy is an average based on participation in different levels of education, the expected number of years of schooling may be pulled down by the magnitude of children who never go to school. Those children who are in school may benefit from many more years of education than the average.