Kazakhstan vs Mexico: Sanitation facilities usage, per capita
Kazakhstan
0 people per person
in 2024
Mexico
0 people per person
in 2024
Kazakhstan rank
129th
Mexico rank
129th
Sanitation facilities usage, per capita over time
- Kazakhstan
- Mexico
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Mexico, a difference of 0 people per person.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.
Kazakhstan ranks 129th and Mexico ranks 129th of 214 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0003 people per person | 0.0671 people per person | 0.0668 people per person | Mexico |
| 2010s | 0.0003 people per person | 0.027 people per person | 0.0267 people per person | Mexico |
| 2020s | 0 people per person | 0.0023 people per person | 0.0023 people per person | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage, per capita, Kazakhstan or Mexico?
- Kazakhstan, at 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Mexico as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage, per capita between Kazakhstan and Mexico?
- 0 people per person, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Mexico?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Kazakhstan and Mexico rank globally for sanitation facilities usage, per capita?
- Kazakhstan ranks 129th and Mexico ranks 129th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.