Jamaica vs Nepal: Sanitation facilities usage, per capita
Jamaica
0.0057 people per person
in 2024
Nepal
0.0053 people per person
in 2024
Jamaica rank
86th
Nepal rank
89th
Sanitation facilities usage, per capita over time
- Jamaica
- Nepal
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 0.0057 people per person against 0.0053 people per person in Nepal, a difference of 0.0004 people per person.
That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Nepal ahead.
Jamaica ranks 86th and Nepal ranks 89th of 214 countries.
Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0088 people per person | 0.5478 people per person | 0.539 people per person | Nepal |
| 2010s | 0.0071 people per person | 0.2614 people per person | 0.2542 people per person | Nepal |
| 2020s | 0.006 people per person | 0.0571 people per person | 0.0511 people per person | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage, per capita, Jamaica or Nepal?
- Jamaica, at 0.0057 people per person against 0.0053 people per person in Nepal as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage, per capita between Jamaica and Nepal?
- 0.0004 people per person, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Nepal?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Jamaica and Nepal rank globally for sanitation facilities usage, per capita?
- Jamaica ranks 86th and Nepal ranks 89th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.