Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Oman: Sanitation facilities usage, per capita
Bosnia and Herzegovina
0 people per person
in 2018
Oman
0 people per person
in 2024
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
129th
Oman rank
129th
Sanitation facilities usage, per capita over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Oman
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Oman, a difference of 0 people per person.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Oman has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 129th and Oman ranks 129th of 214 countries.
Oman has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0034 people per person | 0.0324 people per person | 0.029 people per person | Oman |
| 2010s | 0 people per person | 0.0037 people per person | 0.0037 people per person | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage, per capita, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Oman?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Oman as of 2018.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage, per capita between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Oman?
- 0 people per person, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Oman?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2018.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Oman rank globally for sanitation facilities usage, per capita?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 129th and Oman ranks 129th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.