Bangladesh vs Uruguay: Sanitation facilities usage, per capita
Bangladesh
0 people per person
in 2024
Uruguay
0 people per person
in 2024
Bangladesh rank
129th
Uruguay rank
129th
Sanitation facilities usage, per capita over time
- Bangladesh
- Uruguay
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Uruguay, a difference of 0 people per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Bangladesh ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 129th and Uruguay ranks 129th of 214 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 2 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1182 people per person | 0.0136 people per person | 0.1046 people per person | Bangladesh |
| 2010s | 0.0383 people per person | 0.0061 people per person | 0.0322 people per person | Bangladesh |
| 2020s | 0 people per person | 0.0007 people per person | 0.0007 people per person | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage, per capita, Bangladesh or Uruguay?
- Bangladesh, at 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Uruguay as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage, per capita between Bangladesh and Uruguay?
- 0 people per person, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Uruguay?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Bangladesh and Uruguay rank globally for sanitation facilities usage, per capita?
- Bangladesh ranks 129th and Uruguay ranks 129th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.