Bangladesh vs Kazakhstan: Sanitation facilities usage, per capita
Bangladesh
0 people per person
in 2024
Kazakhstan
0 people per person
in 2024
Bangladesh rank
129th
Kazakhstan rank
129th
Sanitation facilities usage, per capita over time
- Bangladesh
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0 people per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Bangladesh ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 129th and Kazakhstan ranks 129th of 214 countries.
Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1182 people per person | 0.0003 people per person | 0.1179 people per person | Bangladesh |
| 2010s | 0.0383 people per person | 0.0003 people per person | 0.038 people per person | Bangladesh |
| 2020s | 0 people per person | 0 people per person | 0 people per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage, per capita, Bangladesh or Kazakhstan?
- Bangladesh, at 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage, per capita between Bangladesh and Kazakhstan?
- 0 people per person, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Kazakhstan?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Bangladesh and Kazakhstan rank globally for sanitation facilities usage, per capita?
- Bangladesh ranks 129th and Kazakhstan ranks 129th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.