How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and East Timor?

22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs East Timor: Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per square kilometre

Chile

0 people per square kilometre

in 2023

East Timor

0 people per square kilometre

in 2023

Chile rank

96th

East Timor rank

96th

Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per square kilometre over time

Chile
East Timor

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0 people per square kilometre against 0 people per square kilometre in East Timor, a difference of 0 people per square kilometre.

Across all 22 years both countries report, East Timor has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 96th and East Timor ranks 96th of 182 countries.

East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	East Timor	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.2748 people per square kilometre	2.53 people per square kilometre	2.26 people per square kilometre	East Timor
2010s	0.1546 people per square kilometre	1.39 people per square kilometre	1.23 people per square kilometre	East Timor
2020s	0.0177 people per square kilometre	0.0505 people per square kilometre	0.0328 people per square kilometre	East Timor

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per square kilometre, Chile or East Timor?: Chile, at 0 people per square kilometre against 0 people per square kilometre in East Timor as of 2023.
What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per square kilometre between Chile and East Timor?: 0 people per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and East Timor?: 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
How do Chile and East Timor rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per square kilometre?: Chile ranks 96th and East Timor ranks 96th of 182 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs East Timor: Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/sanitation-facilities-usage-in-urban-areas-per-square-kilometre/chile/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/sanitation-facilities-usage-in-urban-areas-per-square-kilometre/chile/timor-leste/">Chile vs East Timor: Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per square kilometre
Unit: people per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 182 places, 4,250 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed: 25 September 2026

Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.