Serbia vs Tonga: Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita
Serbia
0.0003 people per person
in 2024
Tonga
0.0002 people per person
in 2024
Serbia rank
89th
Tonga rank
90th
Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita over time
- Serbia
- Tonga
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 0.0003 people per person against 0.0002 people per person in Tonga, a difference of 0.0001 people per person.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.4 times Tonga's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Serbia ranks 89th and Tonga ranks 90th of 182 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0003 people per person | 0.0002 people per person | 0.0001 people per person | Serbia |
| 2010s | 0.0003 people per person | 0.0002 people per person | 0.0001 people per person | Serbia |
| 2020s | 0.0003 people per person | 0.0002 people per person | 0.0001 people per person | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita, Serbia or Tonga?
- Serbia, at 0.0003 people per person against 0.0002 people per person in Tonga as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita between Serbia and Tonga?
- 0.0001 people per person, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Tonga?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Serbia and Tonga rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita?
- Serbia ranks 89th and Tonga ranks 90th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.