Mongolia vs Rwanda: Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita
Mongolia
0.001 people per person
in 2024
Rwanda
0.001 people per person
in 2024
Mongolia rank
74th
Rwanda rank
72nd
Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita over time
- Mongolia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 0.001 people per person against 0.001 people per person in Mongolia, a difference of 0 people per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 74th and Rwanda ranks 72nd of 182 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0082 people per person | 0.0024 people per person | 0.0058 people per person | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 0.0048 people per person | 0.0017 people per person | 0.0031 people per person | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 0.0018 people per person | 0.0011 people per person | 0.0007 people per person | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita, Mongolia or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 0.001 people per person against 0.001 people per person in Mongolia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita between Mongolia and Rwanda?
- 0 people per person, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Rwanda?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Mongolia and Rwanda rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita?
- Mongolia ranks 74th and Rwanda ranks 72nd of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.