Malaysia vs Zimbabwe: Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita
Malaysia
0 people per person
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0 people per person
in 2024
Malaysia rank
95th
Zimbabwe rank
95th
Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita over time
- Malaysia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 people per person.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Malaysia ranks 95th and Zimbabwe ranks 95th of 182 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0021 people per person | 0.0082 people per person | 0.0061 people per person | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 0.0006 people per person | 0.0035 people per person | 0.0028 people per person | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 0 people per person | 0.0004 people per person | 0.0004 people per person | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita, Malaysia or Zimbabwe?
- Malaysia, at 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita between Malaysia and Zimbabwe?
- 0 people per person, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Zimbabwe?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Malaysia and Zimbabwe rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita?
- Malaysia ranks 95th and Zimbabwe ranks 95th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.