Georgia vs Laos: Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita
Georgia
0 people per person
in 2024
Laos
0 people per person
in 2024
Georgia rank
94th
Laos rank
95th
Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita over time
- Georgia
- Laos
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Laos, a difference of 0 people per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Laos ahead.
Georgia ranks 94th and Laos ranks 95th of 182 countries.
Laos has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Laos | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 people per person | 0.041 people per person | 0.041 people per person | Laos |
| 2010s | 0 people per person | 0.0204 people per person | 0.0203 people per person | Laos |
| 2020s | 0 people per person | 0.0009 people per person | 0.0009 people per person | Laos |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita, Georgia or Laos?
- Georgia, at 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Laos as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita between Georgia and Laos?
- 0 people per person, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Laos?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and Laos rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita?
- Georgia ranks 94th and Laos ranks 95th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.