Ecuador vs Laos: Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita
Ecuador
0 people per person
in 2024
Laos
0 people per person
in 2024
Ecuador rank
95th
Laos rank
95th
Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita over time
- Ecuador
- Laos
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Laos, a difference of 0 people per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Laos ahead.
Ecuador ranks 95th and Laos ranks 95th of 182 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Laos in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Laos | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0156 people per person | 0.041 people per person | 0.0254 people per person | Laos |
| 2010s | 0.008 people per person | 0.0204 people per person | 0.0124 people per person | Laos |
| 2020s | 0.0017 people per person | 0.0009 people per person | 0.0008 people per person | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita, Ecuador or Laos?
- Ecuador, at 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Laos as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita between Ecuador and Laos?
- 0 people per person, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Laos?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Laos rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita?
- Ecuador ranks 95th and Laos ranks 95th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.