Congo vs Tuvalu: Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita
Congo
0.0105 people per person
in 2021
Tuvalu
0.0111 people per person
in 2024
Congo rank
31st
Tuvalu rank
28th
Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita over time
- Congo
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Tuvalu currently reports 0.0111 people per person against 0.0105 people per person in Congo, a difference of 0.0006 people per person.
That makes Tuvalu's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.
Across all 22 years both countries report, Tuvalu has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 31st and Tuvalu ranks 28th of 182 countries.
Tuvalu has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0153 people per person | 0.0236 people per person | 0.0083 people per person | Tuvalu |
| 2010s | 0.0115 people per person | 0.019 people per person | 0.0075 people per person | Tuvalu |
| 2020s | 0.0105 people per person | 0.0144 people per person | 0.0039 people per person | Tuvalu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita, Congo or Tuvalu?
- Tuvalu, at 0.0111 people per person against 0.0105 people per person in Congo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita between Congo and Tuvalu?
- 0.0006 people per person, with Tuvalu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Tuvalu?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Congo and Tuvalu rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita?
- Congo ranks 31st and Tuvalu ranks 28th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.