Comoros vs Zambia: Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita
Comoros
0.0034 people per person
in 2024
Zambia
0.0032 people per person
in 2024
Comoros rank
55th
Zambia rank
57th
Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita over time
- Comoros
- Zambia
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 0.0034 people per person against 0.0032 people per person in Zambia, a difference of 0.0002 people per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Zambia ahead.
Comoros ranks 55th and Zambia ranks 57th of 182 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0019 people per person | 0.0104 people per person | 0.0085 people per person | Zambia |
| 2010s | 0.0026 people per person | 0.0072 people per person | 0.0046 people per person | Zambia |
| 2020s | 0.0032 people per person | 0.0041 people per person | 0.001 people per person | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita, Comoros or Zambia?
- Comoros, at 0.0034 people per person against 0.0032 people per person in Zambia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita between Comoros and Zambia?
- 0.0002 people per person, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Zambia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Comoros and Zambia rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita?
- Comoros ranks 55th and Zambia ranks 57th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.