China vs East Timor: Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita
China
0 people per person
in 2024
East Timor
0 people per person
in 2024
China rank
95th
East Timor rank
95th
Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita over time
- China
- East Timor
How they compare
China currently reports 0 people per person against 0 people per person in East Timor, a difference of 0 people per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was East Timor ahead.
China ranks 95th and East Timor ranks 95th of 182 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and East Timor in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0007 people per person | 0.0392 people per person | 0.0384 people per person | East Timor |
| 2010s | 0.0009 people per person | 0.0177 people per person | 0.0168 people per person | East Timor |
| 2020s | 0.0006 people per person | 0.0005 people per person | 0.0002 people per person | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita, China or East Timor?
- China, at 0 people per person against 0 people per person in East Timor as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita between China and East Timor?
- 0 people per person, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and East Timor?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do China and East Timor rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita?
- China ranks 95th and East Timor ranks 95th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.