Cambodia vs Paraguay: Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita
Cambodia
0 people per person
in 2024
Paraguay
0 people per person
in 2024
Cambodia rank
95th
Paraguay rank
95th
Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita over time
- Cambodia
- Paraguay
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Paraguay, a difference of 0 people per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Cambodia ahead.
Cambodia ranks 95th and Paraguay ranks 95th of 182 countries.
Cambodia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.05 people per person | 0.0031 people per person | 0.047 people per person | Cambodia |
| 2010s | 0.0249 people per person | 0.0032 people per person | 0.0217 people per person | Cambodia |
| 2020s | 0.0029 people per person | 0.0019 people per person | 0.001 people per person | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita, Cambodia or Paraguay?
- Cambodia, at 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Paraguay as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita between Cambodia and Paraguay?
- 0 people per person, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Paraguay?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Cambodia and Paraguay rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita?
- Cambodia ranks 95th and Paraguay ranks 95th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.