Brazil vs Vietnam: Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita
Brazil
0 people per person
in 2024
Vietnam
0 people per person
in 2024
Brazil rank
95th
Vietnam rank
95th
Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita over time
- Brazil
- Vietnam
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Vietnam, a difference of 0 people per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 95th and Vietnam ranks 95th of 182 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Vietnam in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Vietnam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0184 people per person | 0.0112 people per person | 0.0072 people per person | Brazil |
| 2010s | 0.0059 people per person | 0.0049 people per person | 0.0011 people per person | Brazil |
| 2020s | 0 people per person | 0 people per person | 0 people per person | Vietnam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita, Brazil or Vietnam?
- Brazil, at 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Vietnam as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita between Brazil and Vietnam?
- 0 people per person, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Vietnam?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and Vietnam rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita?
- Brazil ranks 95th and Vietnam ranks 95th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.