Brazil vs East Timor: Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita
Brazil
0 people per person
in 2024
East Timor
0 people per person
in 2024
Brazil rank
95th
East Timor rank
95th
Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita over time
- Brazil
- East Timor
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 0 people per person against 0 people per person in East Timor, a difference of 0 people per person.
Across all 23 years both countries report, East Timor has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 95th and East Timor ranks 95th of 182 countries.
East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0172 people per person | 0.0392 people per person | 0.0219 people per person | East Timor |
| 2010s | 0.0059 people per person | 0.0177 people per person | 0.0118 people per person | East Timor |
| 2020s | 0 people per person | 0.0005 people per person | 0.0005 people per person | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita, Brazil or East Timor?
- Brazil, at 0 people per person against 0 people per person in East Timor as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita between Brazil and East Timor?
- 0 people per person, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and East Timor?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and East Timor rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita?
- Brazil ranks 95th and East Timor ranks 95th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.