Brazil vs Sri Lanka: Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita
Brazil
0 people per person
in 2024
Sri Lanka
0 people per person
in 2024
Brazil rank
95th
Sri Lanka rank
95th
Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita over time
- Brazil
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 people per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 95th and Sri Lanka ranks 95th of 182 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0184 people per person | 0.004 people per person | 0.0145 people per person | Brazil |
| 2010s | 0.0059 people per person | 0.0009 people per person | 0.005 people per person | Brazil |
| 2020s | 0 people per person | 0 people per person | 0 people per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita, Brazil or Sri Lanka?
- Brazil, at 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita between Brazil and Sri Lanka?
- 0 people per person, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Sri Lanka?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and Sri Lanka rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita?
- Brazil ranks 95th and Sri Lanka ranks 95th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.