Bhutan vs East Timor: Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita
Bhutan
0 people per person
in 2024
East Timor
0 people per person
in 2024
Bhutan rank
95th
East Timor rank
95th
Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita over time
- Bhutan
- East Timor
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 0 people per person against 0 people per person in East Timor, a difference of 0 people per person.
Across all 23 years both countries report, East Timor has been ahead every year.
Bhutan ranks 95th and East Timor ranks 95th of 182 countries.
East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0095 people per person | 0.0392 people per person | 0.0296 people per person | East Timor |
| 2010s | 0.0047 people per person | 0.0177 people per person | 0.0131 people per person | East Timor |
| 2020s | 0.0001 people per person | 0.0005 people per person | 0.0003 people per person | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita, Bhutan or East Timor?
- Bhutan, at 0 people per person against 0 people per person in East Timor as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita between Bhutan and East Timor?
- 0 people per person, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and East Timor?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Bhutan and East Timor rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita?
- Bhutan ranks 95th and East Timor ranks 95th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.