Armenia vs Laos: Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, annual growth rate
Armenia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2015
Laos
-100 % change on previous year
in 2022
Armenia rank
97th
Laos rank
97th
Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, annual growth rate over time
- Armenia
- Laos
How they compare
Armenia currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Laos, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Laos has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 97th and Laos ranks 97th of 131 countries.
Laos has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Laos | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -8.59 % change on previous year | -1.32 % change on previous year | 7.27 % change on previous year | Laos |
| 2010s | -47.64 % change on previous year | -7.65 % change on previous year | 39.99 % change on previous year | Laos |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, annual growth rate, Armenia or Laos?
- Armenia, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Laos as of 2015.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, annual growth rate between Armenia and Laos?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Laos?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2015.
- How do Armenia and Laos rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, annual growth rate?
- Armenia ranks 97th and Laos ranks 97th of 131 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.