How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Sao Tome and Principe?

24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Burkina Faso vs Sao Tome and Principe: Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per square kilometre

Burkina Faso

25.15 people per square kilometre

in 2023

Sao Tome and Principe

25.43 people per square kilometre

in 2023

Burkina Faso rank

9th

Sao Tome and Principe rank

8th

Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per square kilometre over time

Burkina Faso
Sao Tome and Principe

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 25.43 people per square kilometre against 25.15 people per square kilometre in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0.28 people per square kilometre.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.

Burkina Faso ranks 9th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 8th of 171 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Burkina Faso	Sao Tome and Principe	Difference	Ahead
2000s	31.91 people per square kilometre	50.96 people per square kilometre	19.05 people per square kilometre	Sao Tome and Principe
2010s	29.94 people per square kilometre	36.6 people per square kilometre	6.66 people per square kilometre	Sao Tome and Principe
2020s	26.29 people per square kilometre	27.1 people per square kilometre	0.8093 people per square kilometre	Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per square kilometre, Burkina Faso or Sao Tome and Principe?: Sao Tome and Principe, at 25.43 people per square kilometre against 25.15 people per square kilometre in Burkina Faso as of 2023.
What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per square kilometre between Burkina Faso and Sao Tome and Principe?: 0.28 people per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Sao Tome and Principe?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Burkina Faso and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per square kilometre?: Burkina Faso ranks 9th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 8th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Sao Tome and Principe: Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/sanitation-facilities-usage-in-rural-areas-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/sanitation-facilities-usage-in-rural-areas-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/sao-tome-and-principe/">Burkina Faso vs Sao Tome and Principe: Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per square kilometre
Unit: people per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 171 places, 3,958 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.