Sri Lanka vs Vietnam: Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita
Sri Lanka
0 people per person
in 2024
Vietnam
0 people per person
in 2024
Sri Lanka rank
103rd
Vietnam rank
103rd
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita over time
- Sri Lanka
- Vietnam
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Vietnam, a difference of 0 people per person.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Vietnam has been ahead every year.
Sri Lanka ranks 103rd and Vietnam ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
Vietnam has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Vietnam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0374 people per person | 0.1187 people per person | 0.0814 people per person | Vietnam |
| 2010s | 0.0141 people per person | 0.0473 people per person | 0.0332 people per person | Vietnam |
| 2020s | 0.0002 people per person | 0.004 people per person | 0.0038 people per person | Vietnam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita, Sri Lanka or Vietnam?
- Sri Lanka, at 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Vietnam as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita between Sri Lanka and Vietnam?
- 0 people per person, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Vietnam?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Sri Lanka and Vietnam rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita?
- Sri Lanka ranks 103rd and Vietnam ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.